|
Disposable Prototypes
By Edward D. Engoron, President/CEO
PERSPECTIVES™/The Consulting Group, Inc.
The Situation
The
senior management team of a twenty-five year old regional
fast casual restaurant chain was seeking assistance
in reducing the cost of new unit construction by approximately
$100,000. Company store averages were about
$900,000, with some units as low as $350,000 and a
couple above $2.0 million. Interestingly, but
not surprisingly, we found that many of the more mature,
legacy stores were more likely to be producing higher
volumes than some of the newer, more recently designed
restaurants.
After
spending two very full days on the road visiting a
dozen or so older and newer units, we found a considerable "range" of
designs, facility layouts and performance records.
This range resulted from going off on an IPO "too-t"... too
many (units and designs), too fast, too far away and
with too little infrastructure. You see, after
several years of home grown, self-funded, organic growth,
our client's little company created real excitement
in the marketplace and they were rewarded with a significant
capital infusion which funded the aforementioned "too-t".
Stretched thin, the young, exhausted management team
was unprepared and ill-equipped to deal with the problems
that resulted from their aggressive over-expansion
and public offering.
We also learned that within
the 18 months prior to our introduction, the company
had invested considerable time and money on a project
to develop a new prototype which they expected to produce
$2 million in sales for new restaurants going forward. Unfortunately,
the new prototype - a significant departure in terms
of both the original concept design and operations
layout - did not deliver the goods. However, with
the construction of each subsequent new unit, the management
team tweaked the design to become a little more efficient,
a little less expensive, but not necessarily a little
more compelling or successful, revenue-wise. With
each additional tweak, the restaurants looked more
and more like all the other fast casual concepts in
the marketplace, than they did the original concept's
design.
We
decided to spend some time with the concept's founder
to learn about the roots of his concept. We
asked, "What did you do so right 25 years ago that
made this such a successful concept?" He
told us, "Most college kids go away for spring
break and come back with a sun burn and a hang-over. I
came back with a great idea for a restaurant that I
just knew my college friends [and others] would love
back at home." The menu was ethnic, simple
and easy to execute; the flavors were distinct, unique
and habit-forming; and the concept was as friendly
and unpretentious as the founder.
It
soon became clear to us that our clients weren't over-spending
on buildings and sites, they were under-earning on
revenues. They had lost much of the "magic" that
drew those early crowds in. Over the years,
in response to various external pressures, they had
pinched, squeezed, redecorated and cost-justified their
way into concept abyss! While pinching pennies
and searching for profits, they lost sight of the soul
and the fun of the concept. This is not
an unusual situation by any means... we can all think
of favorite places, products and even people that just
aren't what they used to be, right? Of
course, change is inevitable and expected, but you've
got to stay true to the essence of the appeal of the
original concept. Consumers, customers, guests... whatever
you call them... they always know what's real.
So, this mission was to help our client "get real".
The Objective
Our
Mission was to refocus the brand essence on the original
concept's appeal - find the fun - and drive
the sales. The Business Objective was to develop,
design and implement a competitively distinct, profitable
, high-volume, expandable, small footprint, fast-casual
foodservice concept prototype with strong emphasis
on faster guest service, reduced capital investment,
increased operational efficiency and optimized guest
satisfaction. After all, we couldn't lose sight
of the fact that this was a for-profit business operating
in a fiercely competitive segment.
The Solution
We
began by examining the business model... you can't
redesign your way to success if the concept is based
on a faulty business model. We found that the financial
premise for the original concept itself was indeed
fundamentally sound, unlike some of their competitors
where the business models just didn't work. There
were, however, opportunities for maximizing return
on investment for the business at large. For
example, because new unit development had slowed to
a trickle while management attempted to lock in a successful
prototype design and address the problems associated
with their previous expansion spree, they allowed the
development pipeline to virtually dry up. Additionally,
because they weren't opening a series of restaurants
on a pre-determined schedule, they were not taking
advantage of volume buying (of equipment, furniture,
fixtures, etc.). Also, the few new unit deals
that were being signed, were still being developed
using previous prototypical layouts that were larger,
more expensive and less efficient than desired.
We
then turned to the design of the restaurant itself.
Designing or redesigning a prototype restaurant for
an established chain with a still-active founder can
be a very intimidating process, especially for the
designers and even the client's own project team. In
their rush to "imprint" a
chain's image, many designers fail to look back and
study the history of the company... identifying those
elements that contributed to the company's initial
success. We needed to develop a solution that
would not only be successful for new restaurants, but
could also be applied as a "kit of parts" to
update the older and less distinctive units.
In reviewing a chronological
gallery of photos we had amassed from our initial and
subsequent restaurant tours - covering both new and
legacy stores - it became very apparent that the newer
stores lacked the fun, color, light and casual distinctiveness
that had set the chain apart from its competitors in
the first place. Our gallery included examples from
each of the design eras throughout the chain's history
to identify key points of differentiation from one
era to the next. Working with the client's project
team, we began asking lots of questions, "How
many seats did you gain (lose) with that change?" ... "What
happened to the early artwork and décor package?" ... "How
did the change in the condiment bar impact guest flow?" ... "Did
labor decline or increase as a percentage of sales
with this kitchen layout?"
We
began conceptualizing modified designs and layouts
in a series of internal work sessions by developing
a "wall of ideas" - a large roll of white
butcher paper peppered with design ideas, life-style
photographs, hand drawn sketches, vignettes, swatches
of materials, paint chips, draft floor plans and elevations,
etc. There were several design iterations for each
element, rather than several iterations of complete
designs. This enabled the project team to explore the
interaction between various elements on the ultimate
ambiance, flow and appeal. For instance, there might
be three or four tile options, representing not just
color variations, but design and textural differences
as well. The elements were not constrained by budgets
or even practicality at this point... this was strictly
a blue sky exercise.
While
one might tend to approach a project of this nature
by "starting over" - throwing out all previous
designs in favor of something new - the real world
doesn't work that way. There are political considerations
and financial implications to every decision. In
this case, significant time and money had been invested
in the previous design work and the board of directors
was loathe to allow management to regard it as completely
useless and without value. Additionally, their
customer base had been exposed to the previous, less-than-successful
designs, and it is very confusing to them when the
design and layout of "their" restaurants
are constantly tinkered with and modified.
In
several work sessions with our designers we began to
select, eliminate and hone the design, while the operations
team spent their time challenging the functional layouts
of the restaurant. During this process, we discovered
that not only would we be able to make the restaurant
footprint more efficient, we would actually be able
to deliver more seats by the turning the kitchen on
its ear... a key win for a chain with a disproportionately
higher percentage of sales coming from on-premise dining.
There
were a number of key considerations/goals that were
kept top-of-mind throughout the design process:
- Fun - the original
concept was all about kicking back, taking a break
and having fun; the new design had to contribute to
the fun without trying too hard or being an intrusive
interruption. It had to be authentic, not kitschy.
- Sensual - playing up and
off all five senses; while visual stimulus is obviously
crucial, don't discount the importance of the other
senses... each
should be carefully considered and orchestrated.
- Aroma
- in a restaurant, aromas are very powerful motivators
- both positively and negatively... but remember,
the absence of aroma is unnatural and may come off
as a little weird (think about walking into a chocolate
shop that doesn't emit a wonderful chocolate aroma).
- Sound - it's not just about having
or not having music, thought that is an important consideration;
it's also about sound-reflective surfaces (echoing),
quality sound systems, sound zones, kitchen noises,
themed sounds, etc. It's also about the selection and
programming of the music by day-part. Guests want to
feel one way at lunch and another at dinner, and music
really helps set the mood.
- Tactile - the materials with which
guests interact (touch) should be authentic, theme-appropriate
and not unpleasant. Textural variety is also more
interesting for guests, as it provides opportunity
for discovery in each visit.
- Taste - while we don't recommend
using "lickable" wall
coverings, the design should certainly enhance the
overall desire to dine there and give the food a great
stage on which to be featured.
- Unique and
distinctive - since the concept was first introduced,
several competitors had joined the category, imitating
our client's early designs; the new design had to regain
its distinctiveness.
- Easy to understand
- a fundamental rule of thumb in the restaurant business
is that your guest needs to know what to do and where
to go when they get there; this is especially true
for quick service and fast casual concepts. The new
design needed to connect with the guest the minute
they walked in the door.
- Easy to replicate for our
client, but hard for competitors to copy - this one
is all about the nuances... the client team needs to
thoroughly understand the role and importance of each
design element; that will ensure ease of duplication
as the chain grows. Competitors who lack this understanding
will undoubtedly eliminate or substitute elements they
do not understand or believe to be inconsequential,
resulting in a two-dimensional rip-off at best.
- Affordable - of
course, you must meet the company's financial and expansion
criteria for development, while driving sales. Once
the design elements are selected, there are usually
significant savings to be realized once the procurement
team begins to "shop" them. However, as stated
above, it's important that they have a thorough understanding
of the power of the design...one lighting fixture is
not automatically a substitute for another, just as
a Hershey Kiss isn't a substitute for a Teuscher Truffle!
- Inviting - offer
superior "street appeal";
if all the changes are inside the restaurant, the outside
world may never know. We needed to signal change...
to remind lapsed users that "we're still here" and
to entice rejectors to "give us another try".
This can be especially effective when taking the concept
back to its roots.
- Disruptive - to cut
through the clutter and noise of the competition; whether
building a new restaurant or remodeling an existing
one, it's critical that you get noticed. Again, it's
about that immediate connection with customers who
may only see your sign, building or restaurant for
a few seconds as they drive by... you only have an
instant to make a positive, memorable impression! It
doesn't necessarily have to be in good taste, but it
must be striking and impressive. Make sure they associate
your brand with your design and not your competitor.
- Increase throughput
- reengineer the kitchen to be maximize efficiency
and volume, especially at peak periods, while minimizing
heart-of-house allocation relative to dining/take-out
square footage.
Creating a new "look" for our client was much more
than a design exercise; it was a retooling of the business
geared to create buzz, streamline operations and increase
sales and profits. Based on the prevailing concept
articulation and menu, we developed a new prototype
with detailed elevations, floor plans and a comprehensive
equipment and decor schedule, including written specifications
for use in obtaining bids from selected vendors. New
equipment recommendations were evaluated in our test
kitchens by our internal staff and our client's operations
and quality assurance teams.
If You Build It, They Will See
It may be sad, but it's definitely
true... many people
can look at a set of plans or sketches but not visualize
the final result; and most people cannot project how
the spatial relationships and key design elements will
ultimately feel and function. The only way to
really know is to build it out. To ensure that
the project team was on board with the design, layout
and functionality of the new prototype without putting
it all on the line in bricks and mortar in the marketplace,
we convinced our client to build the restaurant in
a warehouse - like a movie set - where elements could
be tested and changed. We created a full size,
semi-operational prototype of the layout to evaluate
the design and test functionality and flow. The
prototype was revised as necessary and finalized for
approval.
This step proved invaluable
to the team. They
could actually feel the dimension of the space and
experience the design as both a customer and an employee. We
changed out design elements multiple times to test
different operational and functional scenarios. For
example:
- Banquettes
vs. booths vs. tables and chairs
- Menu board
options
- Guest directional
elements - way-signing, flooring, etc.
- Guest perspective
- sight lines from the guest areas into the heart-of-house
and out toward the street
- Alternative
lighting packages and fixtures and lighting levels
- Alternative
sound systems and programming
- Placement and
design of the condiment and beverage stations
- Selection and
placement of kitchen equipment
- Guest queuing
and service options
- Amount, selection and placement
of décor items and marketing materials
Another benefit to the "movie-set" approach was
our ability to bring consumers - customers and non-customers - onto
the set to gauge their reaction to the proposed design. This
was an important opportunity to ensure that our design
fit the brand - that it was authentic and real - and
that we didn't alienate current customers while trying
to invite new guests to the party. Again, allowing
them to be in the space, experience the design, even
eat in the dining room (we brought food in from our
client's nearby restaurant) gave us tremendous insight
into how the design would be received in the marketplace. The
lessons we learned were applied to the set immediately - not
a step easily or cost-effectively accomplished in an
open, operating restaurant.
After
all the tweaks, changes and adjustments were completed,
our team finalized the "kit of parts" discussed earlier... a
series of visual/architectural, audio and aromatic
branding cues/design elements that supported and reinforced
the brand/image subtly and overtly through their unique
application. This "kit of parts" aided the team
in the adapting the new concept to future stores and
for cost-effectively retro-fitting elements within
existing operations. Additionally, many of the
design and décor elements used in the prototype
could be installed in the remodeled stores, making
the entire exercise more cost-efficient.
We
arranged for professional photography of the movie
set and created a presentation that the client's Development
team used for generating excitement among potential
franchisees and key real estate developers for acquiring
favorable locations. And by photographing key
elements of the movie set, our designers were able
to "photo-shop" them onto proposed retrofits of existing
stores... creating a "before and after" presentation
that was used in negotiations with landlords; this
changed the discussion from one of asking for permission
to make changes to negotiating additional tenant improvement
allowances, minimum and percentage rent, dedicated
parking spaces, exterior signage and lighting, spiffing
the center, and extending the term of the lease.
The Results
The
first application of the new prototype will be opening
in early 2006, but the re-image application of the
kit-of-parts is well underway with nearly 20% of the
restaurants completed by year-end 2005. The
results of the project have been very positive in a
number of ways:
- New unit development
has ramped up as retail developers showed great enthusiasm
for the new brand image. New unit growth/expansion
is also an important factor for shareholders.
- Sales at the
re-imaged stores have increased more than 10% and are
well ahead of same-store sales at non-retrofitted locations.
Return on investment for the remodels is running about
85% with a less than 12-month payout.
- Guests love
the new look! They report feeling more comfortable
in the new space (even though there are more tables
and chairs in the dining room), they feel that the
design is right on target with the concept's positioning
and many guests even say that food tastes better.
- Employees love
the new look, too! Morale at the re-imaged stores is
higher because employees recognize that management
has invested in them and because guests are so receptive
and positive about the changes. It's hip and exciting
to work at these locations.
- By the way,
when done correctly the cost of the "movie-set" is
considerably less than building out a new unit and
a whole lot less expensive than building a bomb in
the marketplace. It gives you a lab to test out your
ideas - good ones and bad ones - in the privacy of
your own warehouse and plan your re-image assault without
tipping your hand to your competition. You can keep
the warehouse for a short time, or invest in a more
permanent space that will allow you to upgrade and
test new ideas on an ongoing basis to keep the concept
fresh.
Summary
Without
a doubt developing a new prototype can be a fun and
rewarding process, provided you follow a few simple
rules:
- Stay true to your concept... don't
let outsiders tinker with your business/design to reflect
the latest craze in the marketplace, especially when
your gut tells you not to. If it ain't broke,
don't fix it!
- Don't' go public (at the
early stages) if you can avoid it... most operators
will tell you that the big pay day isn't worth the
long-term costs and pressures associated running a
public company. And if you do go public, remember to
invest in the development of the management team -
especially unit level and field management - that you'll
need to properly run all those new restaurants you're
going to build.
- When embarking on a new prototype
design, be sure to involve and then listen to input
from the operations team, the management team and the
guests. The
smallest details can make a world of difference. Just
know going in that you're bound to make someone unhappy
because you didn't act on their advice. Re-read
Rule #1, make a decision and move on.
- Once you make the transformation,
let the whole world know. For new units, do
it up BIG... make it the media event of the century!
For remodels, try to implement your changes in clusters
of locations where you can celebrate the changes with
lots of communities and guests simultaneously and advertise
your spectacular re-grand opening. Make it a
party!
Back to Top
|
 |